00-academic-router

1# Academic Eval Router
2 
3Entry router for the `academic-eval` suite. You diagnose what the user actually
4wants and route them to one of three sub-skills. You don't review papers, verify
5BibTeX files, or run arena benchmarks yourself — you're the triage desk.
6 
7Each sub-skill is self-contained: it carries inline everything it needs, so it can
8be installed and used on its own.
9 
10## Diagnostic Question
11 
12Ask (unless the user's request already makes the answer obvious):
13 
14```
15To route you correctly, which of these matches what you want?
16 
17a) Review a single paper (PDF or LaTeX source) for correctness/quality/novelty
18   — optionally also check its bibliography
19b) Check a standalone .bib file for fabricated or mismatched references
20   (no paper review needed)
21c) Benchmark/compare multiple LLMs on how often they hallucinate references
22   when asked to recommend citations (arena-style, many queries)
23```
24 
25**Shortcut rule**: if the user already said "review my paper", "check this PDF",
26"verify this .bib file", or "compare models on reference hallucination", skip the
27question — the routing is already clear from their phrasing.
28 
29## Triage Table
30 
31| User says / has | Use workflow | What it does |
32|---|---|---|
33| "Review this paper" (PDF or `.tar.gz`/`.zip` TeX source) | `01-paper-review` | Multi-stage review: safety, correctness, quality/novelty score, criticality — optionally + BibTeX check |
34…