aaai-artifact-evaluation

1# AAAI Artifact Evaluation
2 
3Use this to prepare artifacts that reviewers can use to assess reproducibility. AAAI supplementary
4material is part of the submission record; after review starts, do not assume it can be updated.
5 
6## Artifact package
7 
8- Provide a technical appendix for proofs, algorithms, assumptions, hyperparameters, and extended
9  experiments.
10- Provide code/data ZIPs that reproduce main tables or figures, with a short README, environment,
11  commands, seeds, expected outputs, and runtime.
12- Provide multimedia appendices only when they support the technical claim.
13- Remove author names, usernames, paths, repository history, cloud buckets, API keys, and metadata.
14- Avoid web pointers in the reviewed submission unless current rules explicitly allow them.
15- Include licensing and access notes for datasets, models, and third-party code.
16 
17## AAAI-specific discipline
18 
19- Treat the supplementary deadline as final.
20- Verify ZIP integrity before submission; missing or corrupted files may not be fixable during
21  rebuttal.
22- Make the reproducibility checklist consistent with the artifact package.
23- Prepare a post-acceptance public release path but keep review artifacts anonymous.
24 
25## What an AAAI reviewer actually opens
26 
27AAAI does not run a separate badged artifact-evaluation committee the way some systems venues do;
28the same broad-AI reviewer who scores the paper also inspects whatever supplement you attach. That
29…