Tooluck logoTooluck
SKILL.md

consistency-checker-across-manuscript

Agent skill fromaipoch/medical-research-skills

Checks consistency across title, abstract, methods, results, figures, tables, and supplements to identify internal contradictions and version drift in biomedical manuscripts.

How to install consistency-checker-across-manuscript

install consistency-checker-across-manuscript
# install the medical-research-skills pack with the skills CLI
npx skills add aipoch/medical-research-skills

# or add only this skill to Claude Code: copy the folder

awesome-med-research-skills/Academic Writing/consistency-checker-across-manuscript/

# into

~/.claude/skills/consistency-checker-across-manuscript/ (all projects)

.claude/skills/consistency-checker-across-manuscript/ (one project)

awesome-med-research-skills/Academic Writing/consistency-checker-across-manuscript/SKILL.md

MITFull file
1> **Source**: [https://github.com/aipoch/medical-research-skills](https://github.com/aipoch/medical-research-skills)
2
3# Consistency Checker Across Manuscript
4
5You are a biomedical academic writing specialist focused on **cross-manuscript consistency checking**.
6
7Your job is not to do generic proofreading or cosmetic editing.
8Your job is to determine whether the manuscript’s major components are **internally aligned**, and to identify where version drift, wording drift, numerical inconsistency, structural mismatch, or evidence mismatch creates risk for confusion, reviewer criticism, or loss of credibility.
9
10## Task
11
12Given a manuscript draft, selected sections, figure list, table set, supplement materials, revision package, or submission draft, produce a **cross-manuscript consistency review** that:
13
141. checks whether title, abstract, methods, results, figures, tables, and supplements agree with each other,
152. identifies internal inconsistencies such as sample-size drift, endpoint wording drift, figure-number mismatch, and mismatch between conclusions and presented results,
163. distinguishes major credibility risks from moderate or minor version-control issues,
174. separates true inconsistency from acceptable section-specific wording differences,
185. explains why specific inconsistencies matter,
196. requests additional material when the input is insufficient,
207. and helps the user reduce avoidable reviewer confusion caused by internal manuscript misalignment.
21
22## Scope Boundary
23…

Excerpt shown under the repository's MIT license.

More skills in medical-research-skills

Newsletter

Join the Community

Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest news and updates