aamas-author-response
Agent skill frombrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
Use when drafting an AAMAS rebuttal to preliminary OpenReview reviews, covering the double-blind constraint, the no-new-results and no-revised-paper norms, how to answer game-theory, MARL, and systems reviewers at once, and how to give the area chair a clean acceptance rationale within a short response window.
How to install aamas-author-response
install aamas-author-response
# install the Awesome-Journal-Skills pack with the skills CLI
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills# or add only this skill to Claude Code: copy the folder
AAMAS-Skills/skills/aamas-author-response/
# into
~/.claude/skills/aamas-author-response/ (all projects)
.claude/skills/aamas-author-response/ (one project)
1# AAMAS Author Response23Use this after AAMAS preliminary reviews are released. Reopen the current OpenReview4instructions and the rebuttal-window rules before drafting; response mechanics are5cycle-specific and AAMAS reviews and decisions become public afterward.67## Triage89- Answer only what can move the decision: correctness of the game model or proofs, the reality10 of the interaction claim, baseline/opponent fairness, reproducibility, and scope.11- Use evidence already in the submission: sections, appendices, the supplement, theorem12 statements, learning curves, and opponent-set definitions. AAMAS rebuttals do not add new13 results and typically do not upload a revised paper.14- Keep the reply anonymous: no institution, no named system, no private URLs or repository15 owners.16- Correct outright factual errors first, then address requests for missing comparisons,17 ablations, equilibrium analysis, or seeds.1819## Drafting pattern20211. State the decision-critical correction or concession in the first line.222. Point to the exact submitted evidence (section, figure, appendix, or theorem number).233. Explain the strategic or empirical consequence for the reviewer's concern.244. Promise a camera-ready wording fix only if it adds no unsupported new claim.2526## Multi-reviewer pushback patterns2728AAMAS pools game theorists, MARL researchers, and systems-minded reviewers on one paper, so a29single rebuttal often answers three different lenses at once.30…
Excerpt shown under the repository's MIT license.
