Tooluck logoTooluck
SKILL.md

aamas-author-response

Agent skill frombrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

Use when drafting an AAMAS rebuttal to preliminary OpenReview reviews, covering the double-blind constraint, the no-new-results and no-revised-paper norms, how to answer game-theory, MARL, and systems reviewers at once, and how to give the area chair a clean acceptance rationale within a short response window.

How to install aamas-author-response

install aamas-author-response
# install the Awesome-Journal-Skills pack with the skills CLI
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

# or add only this skill to Claude Code: copy the folder

AAMAS-Skills/skills/aamas-author-response/

# into

~/.claude/skills/aamas-author-response/ (all projects)

.claude/skills/aamas-author-response/ (one project)

AAMAS-Skills/skills/aamas-author-response/SKILL.md

MITFull file
1# AAMAS Author Response
2
3Use this after AAMAS preliminary reviews are released. Reopen the current OpenReview
4instructions and the rebuttal-window rules before drafting; response mechanics are
5cycle-specific and AAMAS reviews and decisions become public afterward.
6
7## Triage
8
9- Answer only what can move the decision: correctness of the game model or proofs, the reality
10 of the interaction claim, baseline/opponent fairness, reproducibility, and scope.
11- Use evidence already in the submission: sections, appendices, the supplement, theorem
12 statements, learning curves, and opponent-set definitions. AAMAS rebuttals do not add new
13 results and typically do not upload a revised paper.
14- Keep the reply anonymous: no institution, no named system, no private URLs or repository
15 owners.
16- Correct outright factual errors first, then address requests for missing comparisons,
17 ablations, equilibrium analysis, or seeds.
18
19## Drafting pattern
20
211. State the decision-critical correction or concession in the first line.
222. Point to the exact submitted evidence (section, figure, appendix, or theorem number).
233. Explain the strategic or empirical consequence for the reviewer's concern.
244. Promise a camera-ready wording fix only if it adds no unsupported new claim.
25
26## Multi-reviewer pushback patterns
27
28AAMAS pools game theorists, MARL researchers, and systems-minded reviewers on one paper, so a
29single rebuttal often answers three different lenses at once.
30…

Excerpt shown under the repository's MIT license.

More skills in Awesome-Journal-Skills

Newsletter

Join the Community

Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest news and updates