aamas-related-work

1# AAMAS Related Work
2 
3Use this to audit novelty and eligibility. Reopen the current CFP for dual-submission,
4anonymity, and prior-publication rules before advising authors; much of the nearest multiagent
5work lives at *other* venues, which shapes both positioning and eligibility.
6 
7## Positioning checks
8 
9- Separate the interaction novelty from engineering improvement: a new solution concept,
10  mechanism, learning-dynamics result, coordination protocol, negotiation strategy, or empirical
11  multiagent finding.
12- Compare across communities: AAMAS itself, the AI conferences (AAAI, IJCAI), the ML conferences
13  (NeurIPS, ICML), and economics-and-computation venues (EC), plus the JAAMAS journal. Many
14  landmark multiagent papers are *not* at AAMAS, so a bibliography that only cites AAMAS is as
15  suspicious as one that ignores it.
16- Treat conference proceedings and journals as archival unless the current rules say otherwise.
17- Cite arXiv and workshop versions without breaking double-blind; do not point reviewers to an
18  identity-revealing page.
19- Explain overlap with any concurrent or prior version, and do not submit duplicate archival
20  work.
21 
22## Cross-community coverage table
23 
24| Literature lane | Typical sources | What AAMAS reviewers check |
25|---|---|---|
26| Agents / multiagent core | AAMAS, JAAMAS, IJCAI, AAAI agent tracks | Whether the nearest multiagent method is compared or explicitly distinguished |
27…