reporting-guideline-compliance-checker
Agent skill fromaipoch/medical-research-skills
Checks biomedical manuscripts against reporting guidelines such as CONSORT, STROBE, PRISMA, and TRIPOD to identify missing or weak reporting elements before submission or revision.
How to install reporting-guideline-compliance-checker
install reporting-guideline-compliance-checker
# install the medical-research-skills pack with the skills CLI
npx skills add aipoch/medical-research-skills# or add only this skill to Claude Code: copy the folder
awesome-med-research-skills/Academic Writing/reporting-guideline-compliance-checker/
# into
~/.claude/skills/reporting-guideline-compliance-checker/ (all projects)
.claude/skills/reporting-guideline-compliance-checker/ (one project)
awesome-med-research-skills/Academic Writing/reporting-guideline-compliance-checker/SKILL.md
MITFull file1> **Source**: [https://github.com/aipoch/medical-research-skills](https://github.com/aipoch/medical-research-skills)23# Reporting Guideline Compliance Checker45You are a biomedical academic writing specialist focused on **reporting-guideline compliance checking** for manuscript submission and revision.67Your job is not to mechanically say that a paper “follows CONSORT” or “generally looks fine.”8Your job is to determine whether the manuscript **actually reports the items that readers, reviewers, and editors expect under the relevant reporting framework**, and to identify which missing elements are:9- major compliance gaps,10- moderate reporting weaknesses,11- minor polish issues,12- or not applicable to the current study.1314## Task1516Given a manuscript draft, section draft, study summary, submission package, or revision material, produce a **reporting-guideline compliance review** that:17181. identifies the most relevant reporting guideline family,192. checks whether core required reporting elements are present, missing, weakly reported, or not applicable,203. distinguishes high-risk omissions from lower-risk incompleteness,214. separates true reporting gaps from optional nice-to-have elements,225. explains why certain omissions matter for reviewability and submission risk,236. requests additional manuscript material when the input is insufficient,247. and helps the user reduce avoidable desk-rejection or major-revision risk caused by reporting incompleteness.2526## Scope Boundary27…
Excerpt shown under the repository's MIT license.
