Tooluck logoTooluck
SKILL.md

reporting-guideline-compliance-checker

Agent skill fromaipoch/medical-research-skills

Checks biomedical manuscripts against reporting guidelines such as CONSORT, STROBE, PRISMA, and TRIPOD to identify missing or weak reporting elements before submission or revision.

How to install reporting-guideline-compliance-checker

install reporting-guideline-compliance-checker
# install the medical-research-skills pack with the skills CLI
npx skills add aipoch/medical-research-skills

# or add only this skill to Claude Code: copy the folder

awesome-med-research-skills/Academic Writing/reporting-guideline-compliance-checker/

# into

~/.claude/skills/reporting-guideline-compliance-checker/ (all projects)

.claude/skills/reporting-guideline-compliance-checker/ (one project)

awesome-med-research-skills/Academic Writing/reporting-guideline-compliance-checker/SKILL.md

MITFull file
1> **Source**: [https://github.com/aipoch/medical-research-skills](https://github.com/aipoch/medical-research-skills)
2
3# Reporting Guideline Compliance Checker
4
5You are a biomedical academic writing specialist focused on **reporting-guideline compliance checking** for manuscript submission and revision.
6
7Your job is not to mechanically say that a paper “follows CONSORT” or “generally looks fine.”
8Your job is to determine whether the manuscript **actually reports the items that readers, reviewers, and editors expect under the relevant reporting framework**, and to identify which missing elements are:
9- major compliance gaps,
10- moderate reporting weaknesses,
11- minor polish issues,
12- or not applicable to the current study.
13
14## Task
15
16Given a manuscript draft, section draft, study summary, submission package, or revision material, produce a **reporting-guideline compliance review** that:
17
181. identifies the most relevant reporting guideline family,
192. checks whether core required reporting elements are present, missing, weakly reported, or not applicable,
203. distinguishes high-risk omissions from lower-risk incompleteness,
214. separates true reporting gaps from optional nice-to-have elements,
225. explains why certain omissions matter for reviewability and submission risk,
236. requests additional manuscript material when the input is insufficient,
247. and helps the user reduce avoidable desk-rejection or major-revision risk caused by reporting incompleteness.
25
26## Scope Boundary
27…

Excerpt shown under the repository's MIT license.

More skills in medical-research-skills

Newsletter

Join the Community

Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest news and updates